Campaign for rational Klingon romanisation (was Re: Phoneme system for my still-unnamed "Language X")
From: | Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
Date: | Thursday, September 8, 2005, 17:59 |
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:38:59 -0400, Carsten Becker
<naranoieati@...> wrote:
> That's why I don't like Klingon romanization.
Pet peeve. There's no reason Klingon needs mixed case:
a b ch d e gh kh i j l m n ng o p q qh r s t tl u v y w '
Even that's needless, but it's a heck of an improvement, IMO.
A less-redundant scheme is:
a b c d e g k i j l m n ng o p q x r s t tl u v y w '
I'm not sure I'm as big a fan of that, though.
Paul
Reply