zwj hack in MediaWiki (Was: Consonant allophones in Minza)

Hi!

Benct Philip Jonsson writes:
>...
> > So I would recommend to *not* use a ‍ to hack-fix a broken
> > behaviour of a browser or font, but instead to use a working browser
> > or font, or if that is out of the question (for whatever reason), live
> > with a distorted display, and/or inform the maintainers of the browser
> > or font of not being Unicode compliant.
>
> I *dis*agree.  I want as correct display as possible *now*, and I
> won't sit around until someone fixes the problem if I
> can fake it now.  I think think that computers should adapt to humans
> and not the other way around.
Well, nothing else is what I am proposing.  But a little bit of
patience for the humans who have programmed them would seem good, I
think.  You can speed up by *informing* the right maintainers.

The big problem is that when everyone hacks around the problems, the
problems will take longer to be fixed and when they eventually are, a
lot of hacks remain that no-one sees easily (such ‍ are not
visible in text).  Such hacks will most probably complicate life later
(e.g. when trying to process such text).

Of course, if you make yourself a list of all your ‍ hacks and
promise to remove all of them when the problem is fixed, then
everything would be fine.  But usually, hacks keep floating around for
a painfully long time.

I've been programming a lot and hacks are bad, bad, bad.  Always. :-)

> I guess I'm not the compliant type...
Obviously not. :-)

**Henrik

Replies