From: | Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 23:31 |
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:08:30 -0400 (EDT), David Peterson <ThatBlueCat@...> wrote:> (3) That's *what I want*. (OSV)Arguably, (3) is SVO, with O as a subclause and OSV in that subclause. That is (what I want) S V O O S V Hold on. The asterisks probably bracket the OSV bit you were talking about, don't they? Oh, well, there goes another post from my quota... Paul
Garth Wallace <gwalla@...> |