Re: Word classification

Charlie wrote:

>
>BTB, I am a faithful monogamist, but that has more to do with the
>conculture than the conlang.  Not long after beginning the conlang I
>discovered that I was much more interested in the conculture.  The
>conlang became one of several vehicle for developing the conculture.
>
Not sure where I stand on the faithfulness scale, though it's certainly true
that Kash (and its culture) are the most developed of my 3.

It's always bothered me (from a realist/theoretical POV) that so far at
least my Planet Cindu has only three language families for its 3 distinct
sentient/loquent species (one, Prevli, a teeny minority lg. of people of
uncertain origin). I can see that the Kash, being telepaths, might all
600million speak langs. belonging to a single family, but I'm beginning to
think that the Gwr (400million) are going to have to have several, no doubt
due to very ancient splits.