Re: inverse constructions
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Saturday, November 6, 1999, 17:37 |
Charles wrote:
> But the way I'm looking at English, it really has ways
> of marking the equivalent of direct and indirect objects,
> by position or preposition.
Right - I was referring specifically to MORPHOLOGICAL case, of which
English has undeniably only two. I'd consider English to have four
SYNTACTIC cases - nominative, accusative, dative, and genitive, of which
the first three are morphologically identical in nouns
--
"It has been postulated that, given an infinite number of monkeys
bashing away at an infinite number of keyboards, we could eventually
reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Thanks to the Internet, we
now know this to be incorrect." - Anonymous
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor