Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: 'true' nature of nouns vs. 'illusionary' nature

From:Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Date:Friday, April 16, 2004, 14:24
Hi!

Danny Wier <dawiertx@...> writes:
>... > Just so happens I'm looking for stuff on Inuit languages.
Me, too. :-)
> Not much online, > but I did find some RealPlayer-format news from CBC in Inuktitut (the kind > they speak in Nunavut).
Do you have a link? I'm very interested in it.
> I can't find a decent description of Greenlandic > (Kalaallisut) phonology/orthography, but I'm sure it's not much different > than Canadian or Alaskan.
I have a short piece of .wav from a Greenlandic film. You can hear a phone call in it. I put it on my homepage: http://www.theiling.de/sprache02.mp3 Further, I bought a nice book recently. It contains concise grammar and phonology descriptions: Title: A Grammar of Kalaallisut: (West Greenlandic Inuttut) Written By: Jerrold M Sadock (University of Chicago) Series Title: Languages of the World/Materials 162 Year: 2003 Publisher: Lincom GmbH Linguistic Field(s): Language Description Subject Language(s): Inuktitut, Greenlandic Lincom is here: http://home.t-online.de/home/LINCOM.EUROPA/ A striking difference between Kalaallisut and other Inuit languages is that the 'typical' -kt- and -qt- clusters to not exist: they collapse into geminate -tt-, thus 'Inuktitut' is not a phonologically correct word in Kalaallisut.
> Since I want Tech to be highly inflected and polysynthetic,
The above book claims that Kalaallisut has the longest morpheme chains of the Inuit-Aleut family. :-) I'm very interested in Tech! I'd like to compare it with S7 (which is still heavily work in progress). **Henrik

Reply

Danny Wier <dawiertx@...>