Re: CHAT: Synesthesia and conlanging (was Re: The Conlang
From: | Matt Pearson <jmpearson@...> |
Date: | Friday, December 3, 1999, 18:53 |
Ed Heil wrote:
>Well, you can look at it both ways. In "The Monsters And The Critics"
>Tolkien is very hesitant about calling artlang verse "poetry." The
>assumption is, I believe, that working with a "given" material, the
>words and constructions of an existing language, is an essential part
>of what poetry is.
>I'm not sure whether Tolkien took these reservations seriously, or
>whether he was only being careful to forestall possible criticisms.
>It surely didn't stop him form doing artlang verse!
If I remember correctly the remark in "The Monsters and the
Critics" that you're referring to, I don't think Tolkien was making a
big philosophical point about artlangs and poetry. Rather, he was
just being coy: He was hesitant to call *his own* artlang verse
"poetry", for the simple reason that he didn't think it was very
good.
Matt.