> On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> >
> > In the case of Classical Latin, I can only cite Adams (1982), and not
> > begin a classicist, I don't know how reliable he is. I'd be rather
> > surprised if from frico, sollicito, tango, tracto, contrecto, truso,
> > trudo, tero, haero, deglubo, glubo, rado, manus fututrix and molo none
> > had survived the fall of the empire... Besides, _masturbari_ is attested
> > in Martial 9, 41: ...Omnia perdiderant, si masturbatus uterque...
> > (Not bad for a copy of Martial from 1853 - it's not bowdlerized, as
> > I feared when I bought it.) I'm also reminded of that charming miniature
> > in the Hours of Duc de Berry, where the peasants are warming their
> > nobility by the fire.
> >
>
> To give credit where credit is due: Adams (1982) is of course:
>
> Adams, J.N. 1982. _The Latin Sexual Vocabulary_, London.
>
> Boudewijn Rempt |
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt
>