generate etymological roots automatically (was: Re: poll 30? (long...Sal at her most voluble))
From: | BP Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 27, 2003, 11:39 |
At 14:18 26.5.2003 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
>Very nice! Perhaps you have hit on one possible solution to the downside
>of automatically generated vocab, viz the flavour of excessive arbitrariness.
>That is, generate the etymological roots automatically, & then run them
>through regular sound changes and other processes such as analogy,
>folk-etymology, metanalysis, etc. etc., and add them into compounds and
>other derivatives that in turn are run through the same processes.
>There'd still be a lot of work involved, but it would overcome the agony
>of inventing the word in the first place, while at the same time resulting
>in the sort of lexical patterning that gives words their sense of fitness.
>
>--And.
Now that's exactly what I do, and in general the results
are satisfying. This kind of thing -- namely apparent
"relatedness" between computer-generated has happened to
me once or twice earlier, though I don't remember anymore
the exact instances, since at those times the roots/lexemes
involved were not so central to the conculture. After a
while they would be indistinguishable from those cases where
I had swapped meanings of doctored with the roots to achieve
relatedness.
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@melroch.net (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /Gaestan ~\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)