Re: "Wife" (was: Homosexuality etc.)
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 29, 2003, 22:06 |
John Cowan sikyal:
> > If you mean the re-drawing of IE trees to split immediately to
> > Proto-Hittite and Proto-Everything-Else, then I agree that the theory
> > isn't current. My current understanding is that Hittite and
> > otherwise-reconstructible PIE are more or less sister languages, descended
> > from a common ancestor that can't be reliably reconstructed.
>
> ???
>
> These two sentences seem to contradict each other. My understanding of
> current orthodoxy is that Hittite is just another branch like Germanic,
> Greek, Italic, or Tocharian, not particularly more remote from the others
> than they are from each other.
This is what Joe said, so I assume that you're right. I must have gotten
confused over which theory was current.
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/
http://students.washington.edu/jaspax/blog
Jesus asked them, "Who do you say that I am?"
And they answered, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being, the kerygma in which we find the ultimate meaning of our
interpersonal relationship."
And Jesus said, "What?"