Re: Re : Deseret Alphabet [was: Re: Regularized Inglish]
From: | Charles <catty@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 29, 1999, 21:47 |
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html wrote:
> whiskey and oceans put aside - an efficient english alphabet would need
> no more than short or long or combined kind of a, =E4, e, =EB, o, =F6, =
u, i
> vowels however you close or open or blow your mouth.
> it's time our anglo-saxon friends remember they are a nifty mix of dutc=
h,
> danes, norwegians, pictons and normans none of whose lang is endowed wi=
th
> 2,857 vowels and consonants as is often claimed among alfredian descend=
ance,
> especially on this list.
Wel then, wai not just uus duch dubl vauls ...
hmm, ai thot ther wer mor long vauls than that in inglish.
Aiwil stiil yors insted:
close ... cloos (screw z anyway, it isn't needed)
oceans ... ooshuns
Wait, maybe accented long vowels were more better:
cl=F5s th dor, or kl=F5s it
g=F5 jump in th =F5shn
N=F5p, firget it.