Re: feminine, masculine and... ?
| From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> | 
|---|
| Date: | Friday, September 22, 2000, 1:53 | 
|---|
Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:
> There also have been repeated attempts to introduce such
> "gender-neutral"
> pronouns into English.  An obvious solution would be using "it"
How would that be obvious?  "It" is for inanimates (or at least low
animacy, insects are "it").
> Another, more successful proposal is to use "they" as a
> gender-neutral singular pronoun.
Not a proposal at all, that's simply the form that's evolved naturally.
And it's very logical.  English 3rd person pronouns can be described
thusly:
   S     P
M  He
F  She
N  It
E        They
(E = epicene)
Thus, the singular use is merely that "they" is no longer "3rd person
epicene plural" but merely "3rd person epicene", thus:
   S     P
M  He
F  She
N  It
E     They
> An agreeable term would be "common gender", I think; at least I
> prefer calling it this way.  Another term occasionally used is
> "epicene".
Epicene is the most common term, as far as I can tell.
--
Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos
God gave teeth; God will give bread - Lithuanian proverb
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor