Re: yet another new conlang; a terminology question (kinda long)

> I can certainly try.  In the future, I'll use a more compatible
> encoding. Can you view the text below?
>
> Shagále, she-zrhkátul, i-dláynos núf ka-házs.
>
> All of the upper-latin characters are a-acute except for the last
> but one, u-acute.
Yep, come through loud and clear.  Thanks.


Jesse S. Bangs     Pelíran
jaspax@ juno.com
"Skin and tragedy always attract a crowd."
    --Pedro the Lion