Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A mixed ergative question...

From:Danny Wier <dawier@...>
Date:Friday, April 12, 2002, 6:10
From: "Garrett Jones" <alkaline@...>

> As for Tech, do you know what each of the cases actually means? There are > three elements that these cases group together in different ways: Agent > (transitive verb only), Patient (transitive verb only), and Subject > (intransitive verb only). Here is what each of the cases includes: > > nominative = A + S > accusative = P > > ergative = A > absolutive = P + S > > maybe you would best consider a three case (tripartite) system, because
that
> is the most that occurs in a single clause. Almost all natural languages
use
> only a dual system, with a few tripartite systems in existance.
That's what I was looking for, tripartite. I considered having all four of those cases but that would be unnecessary since nominative and absolutive are usually unmarked or minimally marked. Georgian has something like what I want; it has a "screeve system": [Format: series (or aspect) = subject > direct object > indirect object] Class 1 = transitive verbs (including causatives); Class 3 = medial (and passive) verbs: -- present = nominative > dative* > dative -- aorist = narrative (or ergative) > nominative > dative -- perfect = dative > nominative > nominative + -tvis "for" Class 2 = intransitive verbs -- all = nominative > dative > dative Class 4 = "inverted" verbs -- all series: dative > nominative *dative is used for both direct and indirect objects -- in Tech, I'll split these into accusative and dative I'm still confused about all these, but Kartvelian verb grammar and consonant phonology arouses me. :-) ~Danny~