Re: conlang survey part 1
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 29, 2002, 18:32 |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:33:16AM -0600, Nik Taylor wrote:
> Heather Rice wrote:
> > (Note: Absolutive, ergative were considered to be
> > normative, accusative in these numbers. However, I
> > realize this isnt a completely correct use of these
> > cases.)
>
> Absolutive and ergative would be more accurately mapped to accusatve and
> nominative respectively, as that is their analogues in transitive
> sentences.
[snip]
*Wonders about non-accusative, non-ergative systems, such as Ebisedian.*
:-P
T
--
Lottery: tax on the stupid. -- Slashdotter