Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, July 13, 2008, 18:10 |
|---|
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:21 AM, David McCann <david@...> wrote:
>> However you replied to this broke the thread, fyi. Showed up as a new
>> conversation...
>
> Sorry about that … though I'm not sure what you mean. I get a daily
> digest and there was nothing odd about it. So what did I do wrong?
Ah, digest. That explains it.
When you reply to a message, your reply automatically includes a
pointer to the message you reply to. That way, everyone who receives
your message and already has the one you replied to sees them grouped
together as a "thread" or "conversation". That didn't happen in this
case since you didn't reply directly to the original message - you
either composed a new message or replied to the digest, and I don't
have the digest because I'm not subscribed in digest mode.
> Dirk Elzinga wrote
>
>> T24gRnJpLCBKdWwgMTEsIDIwMDggYXQgNTo0MyBQTSwgTWFyayBKLiBSZWVkIDxtYXJranJlZWRA
>> bWFpbC5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgoKPiBIb3dldmVyIHlvdSByZXBsaWVkIHRvIHRoaXMgYnJva2UgdGhl
>
> At least, that's what I've received! Is anyone else having this problem?
Dirk's message showed up fine here, but again, I'm not subscribed in
digest mode...
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>