Re: Umlaut
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, August 22, 2002, 9:11 |
Quoting Balazs Sudar <conlang@...>:
> Vowel E:
> When in final position, change: e > i, long e > ei. When not,
> then both short and long remain the same.
>
> Vowel A:
> When in final position, it changes a > ai, long a > ae.
> Anywhere else: a > e, long a > long e
This is a good start, but umlauting is usually taken to mean that
an /i/ in one part of the word causes not diphthongization, but
an actual change in some phonological feature of a neighboring
vowel. So, in Proto-English, "foot" was /fo:t/, and an -i was the
plural ending. This -i shifted the preceding /o:/ forward to
become a front vowel [9:], a vowel at the same height and frontness
of /e:/ but *it kept its roundedness*. Likewise, i-umlaut shifts
/a/ to /&/, a front low unrounded vowel.
(The rules you posit above of course are also possible, but then
one does not usually call them umlaut.)
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier
Dept. of Linguistics "Nihil magis praestandum est quam ne pecorum ritu
University of Chicago sequamur antecedentium gregem, pergentes non qua
1010 E. 59th Street eundum est, sed qua itur." -- Seneca
Chicago, IL 60637
Reply