Re: Creating a metaconlang; anyone want to join?
|From:||Sai Emrys <sai@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, December 1, 2007, 4:17|
On Nov 30, 2007 4:11 PM, <li_sasxsek@...> wrote:
> Sounds like it could be interesting. We could drive the NSA crazy
> with it.
*laugh* I have no doubt that it'd be trivially breakable. I don't
propose any serious encryption; version (c) would be more like a
sophisticated version of codeword based talk.
> Seriously though, maybe a look at Navaho code talk could give some
Any particular (preferably online) references?
Mind that this is intended to be real-time meta on top of normal
speech, not just a pure 'code' language.
On Nov 30, 2007 6:23 PM, Kelly Drinkwater <mizunomi@...> wrote:
> Expressive space? Expressive modes? Channels?
"Channels" is pretty close, except that it's one level too high - e.g.
English certainly uses the channel of "speech", yet it leaves some
parts of that channel unused (clicks, tone, etc).