Re: new relay
|From:||Sally Caves <scaves@...>|
|Date:||Thursday, May 31, 2001, 16:23|
----- Original Message -----
From: John Cowan <cowan@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: new relay
> This list of people is starting to get a tad long.
> Maybe it's time to split into two separate rings? There is no particular
> reason (though it has always been true in the past) why the relay master
> has to participate in the relay! The master can start and end Relay A,
> while someone else starts and ends Relay B; the master still receives
> all the smooth translations from both relays.
I was just going to suggest that. We could have two or even three
relays going simultaneously, perhaps even by different Relay Masters.
Back in the fall of 1999, the Bast Relay with 22 people took a long
time, and it was even more difficult to post all the translations and
make a web for them. Relays with twelve people each would be
more manageable, and would introduce enough change.
> This would also be useful for people who want to participate twice
> with different languages: use one language in A, the other in B.