Mark P. Line scripsit:
> A genetic defect is one possibility, I suppose. Perhaps something very odd
> happened during the evolution of this language. (I dunno, pidginization
> followed by stunted creolization, with lexifiers and substrates all lost
> in the meantime. Or something. *shrug*)
Well, that itself would be informative: it would bash whatever remains
of the Bickerton bioprogram into a bloody pulp.
> Alternatively, maybe there is an additional cultural constraint that
> cannot, due to its nature, be discovered by outsiders: "Don't talk
> straight with outsiders."
That was my first thought. But how could they be so consistent,
including even the children? I'd rather believe in a pervasive
genetic defect than a pervasive conspiracy.
> 2. Never mention color.
This is the one of your six rules I just can't swallow. How would they
know how important basic color terms are to us?
--
You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan
than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.reutershealth.com
graphs; you have a right to be here. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--DeXiderata by Sean McGrath jcowan@reutershealth.com