Re: Enantodromia
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Monday, December 16, 2002, 19:56 |
John Cowan writes:
> Tim May scripsit:
>
> > So that's what it means. Aldiss uses it repeatedly in his
> > _Helliconia_ trilogy (along with the mysterious "eotemporal", which
> > I've mentioned here before) but his definition is less helpful -
> > something like "the process by which things are converted into their
> > opposites".
>
> That sounds about right.
>
> As for "eotemporal", context would help, but it sounds to me like a
> portmanteau word for "in eo tempore", which would mean "in this time"
> as contrasted with "in illo tempore", which means "in that time, in
> mythological time, in the dream time". So something is eotemporal if
> it is part of ordinary secular time.
>
Good try, but the etymology is actually from _eos_, dawn. In the books
it describes the perception of time by a particular non-human
species. A google search reveals that it has been used infrequently
by other writers. I made a post a few months ago quoting what Aldiss
said about eotemporal conciousness - it should be in the archives.