Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Non scol... sed vita... discimus

From:J. 'Mach' Wust <j_mach_wust@...>
Date:Thursday, September 16, 2004, 14:26
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:38:12 +0200, Carsten Becker
<naranoieati@...> wrote:

>Hey! > >My father, cramming together his knowledge of Latin wanted to know if >the sentence "Non scholae sed vita discimus" is correct and which cases >there are -- Though this piece of Latin is what I found on Google. My >dad said first said it'd be "Non scholam sed vitae discimus". When I >told him about what I found on Google he wasn't sure anymore.
When I google for "Non scholae sed vita discimus", then google asks me:
> Did you mean: "non scholae sed vitae discimus"
This is also how I remembered this saying, 'we don't learn for school, but for life'. Both nouns are in dative. The internet doesn't make quite clear whether this is a litteral quote or not, but it seems to be based on Seneca, Epistulae 106, 12. kry@s: j. 'mach' wust

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>