Corrections. Apologies. was Re: Are any of you working on a conlang that is based off of non-indo-european languages?
From: | Wesley Parish <wes.parish@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 30, 2002, 10:58 |
Correctiuon, Correction, correction.
I meant Uralic. I suppose I was tired, and just didn't read what I'd written
carefully enough. My apologies.
On Thu, 30 May 2002 21:20, Wesley Parish wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2002 08:36, Balazs Sudar wrote:
> > > That is, is anyone working on a conlang that has its basis in a
> > > natlang which is not of indo-european origin?
> > > Just curious. If you are I'd like to hear about it...
> > > Cheers,
> > > -Aleks
> >
> > Hungarian counts to European or not? My conlang is based on hungarian and
> > several western-european natlangs, mixed.... Balazs
>
> Hungarian's a Ugaritic language, though from a different branch than the
> Baltic and Northern Russian Ugaritic languages. No connection to the
> Indo-European language family that I know of.
>
> Wesley Parish
--
Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?"
You ask, "What is the most important thing?"
Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata."
I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."