Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
From: | B. Garcia <madyaas@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 23, 2004, 19:39 |
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:56:14 -0500, Sally Caves <scaves@...> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
> Poster: Sally Caves <scaves@...>
> Subject: Re: man- (was: logic vocabulary)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@...>
>
> > Andreas Johansson scripsit:
> >
> >> Eurocentric? What European languages, beyond English, are there that
> >> derive
> >> "woman" from "man"?
> >
> > Indeed, I think even English can be acquitted of that charge, at least
> > diachronically: when the compound _wi:f-man_ > _woman_ was formed, _man_
> > meant primarily 'person, homo, Mensch' (and only secondarily 'man, vir,
> > Mann'), and _wi:f_ meant 'woman'.
>
> Well exactly. The word for masculine human in Old English, as you know, was
> _wer_, cognate with L. vir. Hence you have werhade and wifhade meaning
> "male" and "female." Eugenia, in Aelfric's Saint's Lives, who cross-dressed
> in order to become a monk, was discovered at her death to be a wifhades man,
> "a female person." She was venerated anyway and granted sainthood.
>
> To answer Andreas' query, I think what Remi meant to call to mind was the
> long tradition in western thinking that woman is a deformation of a man; an
> incomplete man,
I've always heard from certainf eminists who don't look up their
sources that they claim that woman is a womb-man, indicating that men
saw them as only objects of procreation and nothing more.
And when i've explained the origins they simply ignore me :).
--
You can turn away from me
but there's nothing that'll keep me here you know
And you'll never be the city guy
Any more than I'll be hosting The Scooby Show
Scooby Show - Belle and Sebastian