Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Stress placement systems

From:H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...>
Date:Wednesday, September 20, 2006, 17:20
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:34:43PM +0100, R A Brown wrote:
[...]
> 1. Ancient Greek did not, as far as we know, have word stress; there > possibly was phrasal stress, but we can merely guess how that might > have worked. > 2. It is clear that ancient Greek words had *pitch* accent. The pitch > was: > (a) *not* dependent upon syllable quantity, but *solely on vowel > length* > (a) high pitch could occur on any one of the vowels in the last > *three* syllables, according to certain rules.
Ah yes, the familiar accent rules of ancient Greek. I think the fact that they differentiated between grave, acute, and circumflex (I forget the native Greek terms for them) should indicate that something more than just stress was happening.
> 3. The modern Greek stress accent occurs (with very few exceptions) on > the same syllable as the ancient Attic & Koine pitch accent(1). This > is a strong indication IMHO that there was no separate word stress to > interfere with the process whereby pitch gave way to stress.
Out of curiosity: how much do we understand of what drives this process?
> (1) In fact even for ancient Greek we know the pitch accent for only > the Attic, Epic and Aeolic (conventionally, other dialects are usually > printed according to the Attic system). The Koine Greek of the > Hellenistic period used the same pitch accent as Attic Greek.
[...] Now I'm curious: what are the sources we have on the pitch accent system of ancient Greek? If I recall correctly, some ancient writings allude to them---what are those sources, and how reliable are they? Also, how confident are we that Koine continues to use pitch accents? I had taken a course on Attic Greek some years ago, and recently I took another course on Koine. I noticed that, unsurprisingly, there were signs that the language was beginning to move in the direction of modern Greek. I'm curious, though, about how much it has done so---esp. wrt. the pitch accent and the fricativisation of the aspirated consonants. (The reason I'm asking is because my Attic Greek course used Erasmic pronunciation whereas the Koine course used modern Greek---and it irks me immensely that many words are homophonous under the modern Greek pronunciation, esp. the 1pp and 2pp, and the itacized diphthongs, when they are obviously pronounced distinctly back then.) T -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares? -- Erich Schubert