Re: Why grammar is so complex a subject
| From: | Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> |
| Date: | Thursday, January 5, 2006, 2:18 |
Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
I don't see how, even without the hyoid evidence, "no language" would be
a natural conclusion. Language doesn't require sound, after all, it's
quite possible to imagine the Neandertals communicating with sign
language. And besides which, plenty of human languages get by on a very
restricted range of sounds, Rotokas having only 11 phonemes. And even
if the _range_ of sounds was limited, they could've extended it via
things like length or tone, or maybe even through combining sound and
gesture.