Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: IPA Question

From:Tristan <kesuari@...>
Date:Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 13:57
H. S. Teoh wrote:

>>I didn't think most dialects would distinguish these two, or if the did, >>this would be the fronter... You speak stupid English, Joe :P >> >> >You mean he speaks non-Australian. :-P >
Yeah, that's what I said, stupid English.
>Where I grew up, 'good' is [gu:d] and 'lute' is [ljut]. >
Okay then... is the vowel in 'good' lengthened because of the /d/, then? e.g. would foot be /fu:t/ or /fut/?
>[snip] > >You're right, 'bird' can also be [b8:d]. >
Of course I am! You implying I'm ever wrong now?!
>Although around these parts it's more often pronounced [bIrd] or [br=d]. >
Freaks! :P
>[snip] > >It's not just Americans; Canadians also say [hr=I] or [hVrI]. >
[hVrI] I can deal with, but [hr=I] sounds like her-ry.
>[snip] > > >At least 'day' and 'die' don't rhyme in my idiolect! :-P >
They don't in mine, either. /d&i/ and /d6i/. It's not my fault if you think /d&i/ sounds like your 'die'.
>[snip] > >>And I expect [au] to be the vowel in 'coat', what's it to ya? >> >> >[au]?! That's really odd. The vowel in 'coat' is [o:] or at worst [o@]. >
Perfectly normal for broader Aussie English is spoken by altogether too many people from these 'ere parts (outer south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne).
>What's "dark l"? >
Veralised? The variety found when not before vowels in many English dialects... I believe it's the sort in Polish before Polish saw fit to turn it into /w/.
>[snip] > > >>/@i;/ been, [i] when unstressed (e.g. family [f&:mli]) >> >> >That's weird. For me, /been/ is always [i] or [I]. >
No it's not, perfectly normal... A phonetically monophthongal phonemically diphthong is stupid, it's just sensible that we'd want to diphthongise it. (/0;/ is just a bit of a slacker...)
>>/I:/ beer, feel (often [I@]) >> >> >For me it's [bi@r]. >
I call that a speech impediment. :P
>>/e:/ hair >> >> >Weird, I have /&/ here. (Being a-e as you state below.) >
Another one of those stupid speech impediments of yours. Learn to talk proper!
>>/&/ can (aux.) (being the a-e ligature) >> >> >We agree here. :-) >
No we don't, they differ phonetically...
>>/&i/ cane (Americans often hear this as kine) >> >> >That's strange. I'd also hear it as "kine". My vowel is [eI] here. >
Yeah, well... you're one of *them* aren't you? Out to get the rest of us!
>>/&:/ can (n.) >> >> >Yep. >
Really? I was under the impression that Americans were foolish enough to diphthongise that into something like /&@/, and your speech seems awfully American...
>>/&u/ town >> >> >Odd. I have /aU/. >
You should see a doctor about that, you know? :P
>>/O/ tonne >> >> >To me it's [a] or [V]. [O] is weird. ;-) >
No, /O/ is what it always was and always should be.
>>/O:/ gone (and only gone, stupid isolated phoneme) >> >> >I have this vowel in 'gone', 'sawn', 'fawn', 'morn', etc.. > >>/o:/ born, fawn >> >> >Weird, I have [O:] here. >
I understand. These things do happen.
>>/8u/ stone [Ou] before /l/ >> >> >Weird. I have [oU] here. >
You have too many dropped /l/s then. :P Tristan. (well, that was fun, wasn't it? Take any of it personally and, if I ever raise the funds to find you, you probably should see a doctor afterwards. People who take humor personally deserve what's coming to them.) http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies - What's on at your local cinema?

Reply

H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...>