Re: CHAT: IPA Question
| From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
| Date: | Friday, June 21, 2002, 4:22 |
In a message dated 06/20/02 1:02:38 PM, christophe.grandsire@FREE.FR writes:
<< Well well... [w] and [u_^] or not the same thing :( . [u_^] is purely
labial,
while [w] is labiovelar :(( . So in phonetic representation you mustn't
confuse
them (on the other hand, you can say that what phonemically is a "glidy" /u/
is
phonetically [w] :)) ). >>
? [u] is not purely labial. There's a constriction at the lips and the
velum, making it a labio-velar vowel. Why would [u_^] be different?
-David
"fawiT, Gug&g, tSagZil-a-Gariz, waj min DidZejsat wazid..."
"Soft, driven, slow and mad, like some new language..."
-Jim Morrison