Re: CHAT: IPA Question
| From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
| Date: | Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 17:53 |
H. S. Teoh scripsit:
> > Along came a spider /sp@i4r\=/
> > And sat down beside her /bisai4r\=/
>
> Hmm. To me, it still rhymes ([r\=] with [r=\]). But I don't claim to be an
> accurate speaker of Canadian. :-)
It isn't that. Words don't rhyme in the European tradition unless they
agree in all segments of the stressed syllable *except* the onset, *and*
in all syllables that follow the stressed syllable. (If the onset of
the stressed syllable agrees too, then that's a "rich rhyme", which is
considered aesthetically deficient; if the rich rhyme involves the same
*word*, that's an "identic rhyme", which is even worse.) So "fitter"
and "splitter" rhyme, but "splitter" does not rhyme with "later".
> [snip]
> > The Fuluffyan's Lament: "I went to Baltimore, I went in a restaurant
> > and ordered a steak, and they served me a porterhouse!"
>
> Ahh... reminds me of the old British "boot" vs. American "trunk". "Put it
> in your boot." "What?!" "Boot." "What boot?! Oh, you mean trunk." "Trunk?
> Huh? You don't look like an elephant!" :-P
In Philadelphia, a "steak" unqualified means "strips of beef sauteed with
onions and green peppers, served with melted cheese in a long roll".
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Cordelia Vorkosigan