Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: IPA Question

From:Tristan <kesuari@...>
Date:Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 15:34
H. S. Teoh wrote:

>No, no, you don't get it. To *me*, Australian is more "stupid" than >American. > ><flamesuit on> ;-) >
You, presumably, haven't heard of one George W. Bush, or the people who voted him in.
>>>Where I grew up, 'good' is [gu:d] and 'lute' is [ljut]. >>> >>> >>> >>Okay then... is the vowel in 'good' lengthened because of the /d/, then? >>e.g. would foot be /fu:t/ or /fut/? >> >> > >It's [fut] or [fUt]. The former what I grew up with, the latter what the >local Canadians say. [f8t] is another alternative. I don't think you can >make any generalizations based on spelling, because English pronunciation >has drifted so far away from spelling that such generalizations aren't >reliable. >
No, true, but it seems you speak one of those dodgy dialects that have a stronger correlation between length and voicedness of following consonants than mine does.
>>[hVrI] I can deal with, but [hr=I] sounds like her-ry. >> >> >But there's no such word as "herry", so nobody cares. :-P >
Nor is [bremoir@n], but if I went around saying that for 'cucumber', you'd be excused for not understanding me.
>Well! It's not *my* fault that the first time I heard an Australian >greeting, I thought the person said "go die, mite!" ;-) >
Sure it is. I've never heard 'g'day mate' as 'go die, mite', why should you?
>Aha, Melbourne. Been there, heard that. :-P >
Best city in the land, wouldn't you say? (Note: if you answer incorrectly, it will be plainly obvious that you're a happy-snappy tourist, and uneducated as well, so I'll be forced to keep your opinions in the lowest esteem. Not that I don't already, Australian stupider than American indeed...)
>OK, I only have a faint clue what a velarised 'l' might be. I don't think >I've encountered it in English. Not that I noticed, anyway. >
Does 'velarized' help any? Some sort of co-articulation happening with the velar and the alveolar areas?
>[snip] > > >Well! How do you tell "been" from "bean" then? At least around these parts >the former is [bIn] and the latter is [bi:n]. >
Stress, maybe length... the recitation form of 'been' and 'bean' are the same, but when spoken in a bunch of other words, one woul be [bin] and the other [b@i;n] I guess...
>>>>/I:/ beer, feel (often [I@]) >>>> >>>> >>>For me it's [bi@r]. >>> >>> >>I call that a speech impediment. :P >> >> >No, that's more authentic. (In the colonial British sense.) So there! :-P >
Bah, more authentic schmore authentic. Smith's Chips may be the original, but Thins are the best. (Not counting things like fish-and-chips chips (like french fries, only different for you Merkins), pringles, corn chips.)
>[snip] > > >>>>/&/ can (aux.) (being the a-e ligature) >>>> >>>> >>>We agree here. :-) >>> >>> >>No we don't, they differ phonetically... >> >> >? >
The two sounds, though very similar, are different. Trust me. Americans (and Canadians, and anyone else who happens to live in that general direciton) have a stupid-sounding /&/. I dunno what exactly the difference is, but based on the fact that my [e] has run up in comparison with your [E], and Kiwi [I] is the equivalent of my [e] (so they say nick for neck), and their [e] is the equivalent of my [&] (so they say ken for can), it would not suprise me if my [&] was higher than yours. If you followed that, congratulations. If not, I forgive you.
>[snip] > > >>>>/&:/ can (n.) >>>> >>>> >>>Yep. >>> >>> >>Really? I was under the impression that Americans were foolish enough to >>diphthongise that into something like /&@/, and your speech seems >>awfully American... >> >> >"American"? LOL... obviously you don't realize that Californians can't >understand Bostonians, and both can't understand Texans. And the Kanucks >among whom I live despise all three. :-) >
Oh yes, I did realise that, but 'American' refers to that variety of American such is heard on both American and Canadian television shows.
>Personal? LOL... I was just [p_hleIn= @lo:N wiDja]. :-P >
I imagined so, but there's too many people who simply wouldn't understand, the fools... Tristan. http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies - What's on at your local cinema?

Replies

H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...>
John Cowan <jcowan@...>