Re: Pater Noster (purely linguistically)
From: | Wesley Parish <wes.parish@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 5, 2004, 8:44 |
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 18:57, Shaul Vardi wrote:
> I don't want to say anything about the religious wars that have broken out
> here, except that:
> a) They are making me regret my recent decision to rejoin the group (albeit
> in an essentially lurking capacity).
I'm sorry if you feel you have to leave us.
> b) To continue to use the heading "Pater Noster (purely linguistically)"
> long after pure linguistics (or anything pure) have been thrown in the
> garbage seems... well, slightly disingenuous.
I agree. On the other hand, or paw, or hoof, I'm an opinionated B!@#$rd who's
only too happy to spout off on my conculture and conworld. I don't intend to
offend you, so if I have done so, I apologize.
>
> Kabiř pax mix qytsút
> [Great peace from Jerusalem]
--
Wesley Parish
* * *
Clinersterton beademung - in all of love. RIP James Blish
* * *
Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?"
You ask, "What is the most important thing?"
Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata."
I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."