Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Friday, October 25, 2002, 18:22 |
Muke Tever wrote:
> > Does anyone here speak a dialect which has both of those
> > pronbounced the same?
>
>Someone [foreign, whose post I can't find at the moment] mentioned that the
>difference between their /f/ and /v/ was mostly fortis/lenis rather than
>voiced/unvoiced.
Thas was me. Swedish voiced consonants tend to be not, especially
word-finally. However, among the stops it's normally aspiration which's the
most significant, and /f/ is the only non-stop that's got a "voiced"
counterpart.
>Last night I developed a hypothesis that Australian does the same thing
>with /T/
>and /D/, which my brain came up with as an explanation for why at least two
>or
>three Australians on this list had trouble finding the 'voicing' in /D/.
>Does
>that sound plausible?
>
>Anyway, I reeeeeally think English interdentals belong in the FAQ.
Me too. Therefore, I propose that you write up something and send it tp
Peter Clark! And obviously, with me being a furriner you can't argue I
should do the job! :-)
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp