> On a side note, there's a related article on this topic at Slashdot
> <
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/06/09/1924218.shtml?tid=146&tid=99>.
> Having read that, I seem to have discovered that 'cursive' in the US has
> a rather more specific meaning then it does over here and at least your
> lowercase Rs (and most uppercase letters---our uppercase letters are the
> same in print and cursive) look horribly different. Essentially the only
> changes between what I learnt as cursive and print are that in cursive,
> you get loops on ascenders/descenders and that make a few allowences for
> the letters being connected (s may also get its topped lobbed off, but
> that's entirely optional and not doing it wouldn't make your writing not
> cursive). I'm not sure whether our cursive is the italic/print-cursive
> they mention or not, though.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]