Re: Celtic languages?
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 19:48 |
>>
>>On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, at 04:58 , Joe wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>
>>>But the thing showing it as Q-celtic was
>>>the '-cue' ending. Gaulish, AFAIK, has '-pe'.
>>>
>>>
>>Only if there is sufficient evidence to link it with the IE languages of
>>Gaul, Britain & Ireland. It could, for example, be cognate with the
>>Etruscan -c (and) and, despite the efforts of many, that languages resists
>>all credible attempts to connect with IE or, indeed, any other known
>>linguistic group.
>>
>>
>
>Some people consider it likely that Etruscan is related to IE, but
>apart from the fact that the evidence is too tenuous, if "Celtiberian"
>is most closely related to Etruscan, it is definitely not "Celtic"
>in any linguistically meaningful sense of the word - even if Etruscan
>was related to IE.
>
>
>
Indeed. Celtiberian is quite patently IE, Celtic(removes /p/, most
prominently, among other things), and Q-Celtic(/k_w/ does not > /p/).
Reply