Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Scandinavian Languages

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Monday, August 18, 2003, 20:09
Quoting Isidora Zamora <isidora@...>:

> At 08:51 PM 8/18/03 +0200, you wrote: > >At the BEGINNING of _sju_? Foreigners are supposed to have trouble with the > >vowel, not the consonant, of that ... > > Is that a high front rounded vowel? (I ask because the Danish is syv.) If > so, then I can imagine foreigners haivng trouble with it. It took me some > time to get it right, and I simply can't get my daughter to pronounce > it. Often, she won't even try.
Exactly what vowel it is depends on dialect. In mine, it's a high central rounded vowel. Some dialects have a labialized (same lip position as Swedish "o" if that's any help) version of this, some a labialized [2] (mid- high front rounded). None is exactly usual, and substituting [y] or [u] is a bad idea - those are both claimed by other phonemes (don't even think of using a plain [2]!).
> >The consonant depends on dialect - mine have [x^w], which is pretty common. > >That labialization isn't phonemic by the way - I have it before rounded > >vowels, some people have it everywhere and skipping it totally shouldn't be > a > >problem. Some dialects, eg in Finland, have [S] or [S^w]. Some have [x\], > and > >for some reason textbooks are prone to give that or [S]. > > > >(In case you're unfamiliar with the phonetic transcription I'm using (X- > >SAMPA), [x] is "ch" as in German "Bach", [S] is "sh" as in English "fish" > and > >[x\] are those two pronounced simultaneously. [^w] indicates labialization > of > >the previous sound.) > > Thank you for the explanation. I have heard the sound pronounced a long > time ago (before I had the linguistic training to catagorize things) and > have since wondered if it was some sort of palatal fricative (or > palatalized velar). Now I know. (BTW, learning to coarticulate [x] and > [S] could take a considerable amount of practice for some foreigners to > acheive.:)
Certainly, but there's little reason they should adopt the most exotic pronunciation. I should perhaps add that another fairly common variant is a voiceless velar approximant. I think the X-SAMPA for that is [M\_0]. Andreas

Reply

Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...>