Re: Poll by Email No. 2
|From:||Danny Wier <dawier@...>|
|Date:||Sunday, February 24, 2002, 9:12|
From: "Matthew Kehrt" <matrix14@...>
| E or B. (Pound it in as you wish.)
| I see auxlanging for the purpose of creating an IAL to be silly and a
| waste of time, simply because it will never succeed. The language of
| the dominant culture in an area will already serve as a lingua franca.
| Any attempt to create a new IAL will almost certainly fail because (a),
| no one will use it, because one already exists (greek, latin, french,
| english etc.), (b), no one wants to be forced to learn something and
| (c), people hate change anyway.
| That said, auxlanging from an artlang perspective is fine. To create a
| langauge for the fun of it is reasonable and, of course, fun. This
| includes languages that could be used as IALs, or which were created to
| be as easy to learn for as wide array of people as possible. However,
| to expect people to actually speak your language as an international
| language is ridiculaous.
I would hardly consider Esperanto a failure! The world is catching on
s-l-o-w-l-y (especially in America). Perhaps a type of Basic English might also
work, though there are many natlangs I'd rather have as a global lingua franca
But there's also Lingua Franca itself, which (I believe) was used in the
Mediterranean and based on a bunch of European languages as well as Arabic. That
was a sort of pre-Esperanto, and you got stuff on the web for it.
(A similar auxlang to LF, Polari, somehow became chic among British gay men at
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com