Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: VW (was: Digest 2 Apr)

From:Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...>
Date:Thursday, April 5, 2001, 16:08
> At 2:25 pm -0400 4/4/01, Yoon Ha Lee wrote: > >On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Raymond Brown wrote: > [snip] > >> is unprovable. We can be fairly certain, I think, that it was a labial > >> approximant of some sort; but whether it was the bilabial [w] of British & > >> American English, or the labio-dental (denoted rather oddly IMO as [P] in > >> SAMPA, a stylized lower case upsilon in real IPA) of Indian sub-continental > >> English, we simply do not - and cannot - know. > >[snip] > >Oh dear. This will teach me not to take Wheelock's pronunciation guide > >literally. <guilty look> > > Wheelock is actually one of the best text books I've come across in showing > a fairly accurate (as far as one can tell) guide to classical Latin > pronunciation; he is particularly good at indicating vowel length and word > stress in a consistent way.
Okay. Thanks for clearing that up. (I do confess that in the 3rd ed., which we're using in class, I have to squint to tell if accented syllables are also long syllables...but that's attributable to my lousy eyesight more than anything else.)
> But it is a text-book for people who want to learn a language no longer > spoken; so one cannot expect it to go into the finer points of what may or > may not have been exactly the way particular sounds were made. In any > case, even if we did have precise knowledge that the Roman u-consonant was > a labiodental approximant, would there be any point in a text book like > Wheelock's making a fuss about this when the English /w/ is a close enough > sound? One's not likely to meet an ancient Roman :)
<G> The prof told us we didn't have to bother rolling the r's if we couldn't manage it (I still can't do trills consistently).
> Wheelock, I think, would not claim that the pronunciation he shows is 100% > accurate. If you followed Wheelock, you could probably say Latin that > would be intelligible to an educated Roman around the 1st centuries BC and > AD; but your Latin would necessarily be spoken "modo barbaro" ;)
OC any Roman meeting someone of my appearance would definitely take me as a barbarian Asian. =^) O, for a horse and a bow... YHL, dreaming friendly Mongol-inspired dreams

Replies

Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...>
David Stokes <dstokes@...>