Re: New/revised language: Phonology

Andrew Chaney wrote:


>on 18/12/01 13:07, Roger Mills (romilly@EGL.NET) wrote:
>
>> (BTW all the symbols came thru to me unscathed)
>
>>> ¦ /?/ english "aw" as in "awful"
>> Personally I disapprove of using a non-alphabetic symbol.
>
>That's supposed to be an o-e ligature. Not a stretched, integral "s".

How strange. I saw a broken vertical line.  Usually oe lig. comes thru OK
(Alt-01560).