Re: Accent Terminology Question
From: | Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 17:41 |
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 06:14:55 +0000, Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>
wrote:
>David Peterson wrote:
>
>>(P.S.: It shouldn't come out blue anymore. As for 8 pt. font... I'm
>>sending it with 12, so I don't know how that's happening.)
>
>Believe it or not, but this make thru' as red-on-white to me. More readable
>than the blue-on-cyan, but still pretty bad.
>
>
> Andreas
>
Let's hope David gets his Mac/AOL problem resolved soon.
As for the accentuation patterns, there was something else I didn't
mention. The phonology also includes schwa, which isn't normally written.
According to my rules, a phonetic CVCVCV (all short vowels) word should be
accented on the antepenult, e.g. BIgeta. However, I have trouble with this
when the antepenult vowel is a schwa and the penult vowel isn't, e.g.
B@gati. I'm thinking of moving the HI to the penult in this case (b@GAti),
but that would add another rule. Any thoughts? Also additional comments on
my original question about the 3rd type of accent would be welcome -- I
still haven't come up with a term for it yet.
Jeff