Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: k(w)->p

From:<raccoon@...>
Date:Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 21:36
> -----Original Message----- > From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On > Behalf Of Ed Heil > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 5:51 PM > To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU > Subject: k(w)->p
> Does any historical linguist out there know if we have any other, > independent evidence of labialized velars becoming labials, or, on the > other hand, of doubly articulated labial-velars becoming labialized > velars?
I'm no historical linguist, but I know that in Sard and Romanian, two Romance languages, it happened; thus Sard <limba> for Latin <lingua>. Other IE languages with the change k_w>p include Greek (in some cases), Oscan/Umbrian, the so-called P-Celtic languages such as Welsh and I think Gaulish, and probably some others. I'm trying to think of non-IE languages like that, but haven't come up with any so far, due simply to my lack of familiarity with external histories of non-IE languages. I think the change does make sense though, as much as k_j>c makes sense. I imagine the sound might have gone through a phase where it was a coarticulated k_p; if people progressively tightened their lips more and more as they pronounced it it would become k_p, and from there I think it's easy to imagine it dropping the velar component altogether. Eric Christopherson raccoon@elknet.net