Re: Tolkien's "hidden" conlang
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Monday, September 27, 2004, 9:59 |
On Sep 27, 2004, at 12:27 PM, Wesley Parish wrote:
> the one the Dwarves spoke.
> It seems to have triconsonantal bases. Eg, the Moria tomb inscription:
> Balin Fundinul
> Uzbadkazaddu:mu
> Balin son of fundin lord of moria
> and Gimli's war-cry before Helm's Deep:
> Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu
> Assuming Fundin to be a human name like Balin, -ul is then a
> patronymic.
> uzbad would be z-b-d, to rule, with zero grade between z-b and a prefix
> indicating the actor - ie, the lord. du:mu would likewise be d-w-m -
> to dig,
> with a genitive -u. b-r-k is "edged weapon", "axe", with the vowel
> pattern
> -a-u- indicating the plural. One would expect Khazud for "Dwarves".
> The major problem is these are the only traces of the language Tolkien
> took the time to develop.
> Am I talking through a hole in my head?
> --
> Wesley Parish
> * * *
No you're not!
Although "Dwarves" is attested - _khazâd_.
The -a-u- pattern of _baruk_ might be a plural *construct* form.
Check out:
http://www.uib.no/People/hnohf/khuzdul.htm
-Stephen (Steg)
"Let them come.
There is one dwarf yet in Moria who still draws breath."
~ gimli son of gloin, LotR:FotR (movie version, at least)
Reply