Re: Concalendrical reference point
From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 27, 2002, 15:50 |
In a message dated 05/26/2002 09.41.52 AM, jcowan@REUTERSHEALTH.COM writes:
>I would recommend instead that you use the year 4173 B.C.E.
>It is comfortably before the beginning of history, and is the base
>date for the Julian day count: 2452421 days ago. This date was
>chosen as the year in which three different cycles were all in
>registry: the 28-year solar cycle of the civil year, the 19-year lunar
>cycle of the Babylonian/Jewish year, and the arbitrary 15-year cycle
>of the Roman tax year.
So by this reckoning it is the year 6175? Neat idea. ". . . 6175
Terran..."
Hanuman Zhang
~
"When you lose a language,
it's like dropping a bomb on a museum." ~ Kenneth Hale
-----------~§~-----------
en legoset _ creolego _ =
¡ gwerra sumtotall-morda legotaxo!
¡ banc poli en-noxa legoplex ! creo legoplex !
trans-litteral-slice-ation into English:
in Creo-Lego word-set <vocabulary>:
War word-system sum-total(all)-death !
<combat/fight linguistic extinction!>
Save multiple in-danger language{s}! Create language[s]!