Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: /p/ versus devoiced b?

From:Danny Wier <dawier@...>
Date:Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 6:06
> -----Original Message----- > From: Constructed Languages List [mailto:CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU]On > Behalf Of Yoon Ha Lee > Sent: Tuesday, 30 January, 2001 2:22 PM > To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU > Subject: Re: /p/ versus devoiced b? > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Danny Wier wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > Behalf Of Yoon Ha Lee > > > Sent: Sunday, 28 January, 2001 10:19 AM > > > > > Nah, I wouldn't do this to you. But I could possibly give a better > > > question if someone would explain what the difference is > between /p/ and > > > devoiced /b/, because the little phonetics/phonology I've > had/have read > > > is absolutely no help is figuring it out. :-/ > > > > I'll throw some links your way: > > > > > http://dir.yahoo.com/Social_Science/Linguistics_and_Human_Language > s/Phonetic > > s_and_Phonology/ (from Yahoo!, but all in English) > > I tried a search in Yahoo! Korean but found no links pertaining to > > "phonetics and phonolgy". For "Linguistics and Human Languages", > > http://kr.dir.yahoo.com/Social_Science/Linguistics_and_Human_Languages/ > > (make sure your OS or browser can read Hangul!) > > We went over it a little in phonetics/phonology today. :-p There were > people in the class getting frustrated because they couldn't hear the > difference between /b/ and /p/ (no aspiration) being pronounced by our > Chinese prof, while I sat there thinking, "Thank God for Korean." > > I guess it's one of those continuum things. The difference between > devoiced /b/ and unaspirated /p/ seems kinda small, and I have to be > paying attention to tell the difference. > > > To me a voiced consonant means that the vocal cords vibrate continually, > > while with voiceless consonants, the vocal cords stop while the > > lips/tongue/throat closes for the consonant sound. In Korean, the "lax" > > consonants are voiced in between vowels. It might take a good bit of > > practice. > > Oh, and as to ejectives--I hit Ladefoged's pronunciation of IPA chart > symbols via the Yahoo! phonetics/phonology links. I can say definitely > that the "tensed" or "glottalized" consonants are *not* ejectives. If > anything, the ejectives sound like, well, really strong versions of the > aspirated stops.
Since they're transliterated very often as double consonants, maybe the best bet is to pronounce them as geminates. (I forgot, I do have a conlang -- Q (also known as Quaelits) -- with "tense" consonants, ejectives and "tense" ejectives! I cheat and make the tense consonants pharyngealized.)
> Does *anyone* know how IPA represents this glottalization thing? _The > Korean Alphabet has /p'/, /t'/ etc. but doesn't call them ejectives, and > they sure don't sound like ejectives. Most puzzling.
IPA uses apostrophe after the letter for ejective. An older alternative is to add a hook on top of the letter, but that's used only for voiced implosives now. http://www.geocities.com/dawier _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com