Re: gender in English
From: | Marcus Smith <smithma@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, September 6, 2000, 3:40 |
Robert Heilman wrote:
"SMITH,MARCUS ANTHONY" wrote:
>> Another point to think about: the gender we typically assign to
>> personifications and anthropomophisms often corresponds to the Old English
>> gender. For example, Death is a male; in children's stories dogs are
>> usually male, cats female. And the Moon has a man in it, not a woman.
>> Makes sense if English has gender for all its nouns, but is much more
>> lenient in enforcing them.
>>
>
>That's an interesting idea, Marcus. I'd never thought of that. My first
>inclination, though, is to attribute that to the Old English genders
>still embedded in our social subconscious, surfacing with
>personification & such, rathern than to the genders still being active
>in Modern English.
That's how I think of it too. I just pointed out the alternative as a Conlang
idea. Keep the juices flowing, and all that.
For example, Death might typically be male in our
>literature, but that's more tradition than the language. If I were to
>write a story with Death as a female, it wouldn't be the traditional
>personification, but it is still perfectly acceptible in our language.
I did this for a Creative Writing course a few years back. The prof. loved
it. Lots of comments/praise for breaking with tradition and being, well,
creative.
Marcus
===============================
Marcus Smith
AIM: Anaakoot
"When you lose a language, it's like
dropping a bomb on a museum."
-- Kenneth Hale
===============================