Re: Another question: genders

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:39:19 -0400 "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@...>
writes:
> Actually, I think I found some terms that might work for my conlang's
> two
> odd genders:
>         ambiguous       ==>     common
>         ambivalent      ==>     double
>
> The phrase "double gender" sounds like it captures what I want in
> that
> gender. Also, I might use "epicene" instead of "common", but since
> they're
> about the same, I'll just randomly pick one.
>
> What do you people think? :-)
>
>
> T
-

I liked the old names :-) .


-Stephen (Steg)
 "verbing weirds language."  ~  calvin (& hobbes)