Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: lexicon

From:Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Date:Sunday, June 1, 2003, 0:55
Hi!

Garrett Jones <conlang@...> writes:
> > At 00:57 29.5.2003 -0700, Garrett Jones wrote:
...
> > Why? Synonyms isn't a Bad Thing. Especially not for poets! > > i'm not a poet and i'm not big on reading poetry either. Real language is > created first for communication, and secondly for arts, and that's the way > i'm creating Minyeva. Minyeva kind of has some auxlang qualities, one of > them being the lack of synonyms/homophones. It's a lablang, vs. being an > artlang.
Hmm, 'real' language is created for the purpose the creator thinks it has. :-) My purpose is usually simplicity, fun, abstraction. Minor purposes are beaty, which includes subjective things like the mere sound and peotry, but I never got to a lexicon that allowed for good peotry. Just recently, I threw out a word for 'birth' from Tyl Sjok, because I found that I have two. I had created both of them with minor, contextually selected sub-meanings. One was more 'life, to live, to be born', one was more restricted to 'birth, to be born'. I hesitated for a long time to erase one, because it was the first 'natural' almost-synonym. I did erase one, because 'to live' is durative and not stative and I had formulated a (weak) rule that the lexicon prefers stative entries. If this technical reason had not existed, I would have decided to keep both for poetry freedom. The kept entry now means 'to be born' (stative). You can derive regularly: 'to be born (to experience birth), birth (the event the child has)' (event), 'to live' (durative), 'to give birth (the controlled event), birth (the event the mother has as an agent and the child has as a patient)' from this. **Henrik