Re: Time machine
From: | Robert B Wilson <han_solo55@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:27 |
Christopher B Wright <faceloran@...> pekat:
> Roger Mills sekalge:
> > Small problem: exactly _where_ would you have the Time Machine
> send
> you?
> > :-)) Better take along an *ekwos just in case you need to
> relocate......
>
> Better a spacecraft. There's a little problem with time travel. In
> an
> hour, the world moves a significant distance (if I recall
> truthfully, 600
> miles, not to mention rotation).
Relative to what?
In seven thousand years, it moves
> much
> more. The sun also moves a lot in that time, as well as this galaxy.
Again, relative to what? Also, as Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> already
wrote, a time machine might "remain stationary relative to the dominant
gravitional field." If this is the case, the movement of the earth would
not be a problem.
Reply