Re: CHAT: cultural interpretation [was Re: THEORY: language and the brain]
| From: | Tristan <kesuari@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, July 3, 2003, 16:32 |
|---|
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 01:59, Peter Bleackley wrote:
> I was thinking that voiced stop = stop + voice
> aspirated stop = stop + aspirate
> stop => stop
> voice => aspirate
Well, actually in a lot of cases, it's presently more like
aspirated stop => aspirated stop (/t/=[t_h] => /t/=[t_h])
(voiced) stop => stop (/d/=[d] => /d/=[t])
which is even simpler, too.
--
Tristan.