Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Dolphin intelligence (Re: Origin of names (WAS: Re: Proto-Uralic?))

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 1, 2003, 22:10
Quoting Stone Gordonssen <stonegordonssen@...>:

> >That people are prejudiced, and have been so in the past, is no > >revelation. But you cannot simply assume that something is true on > >the grounds that those who disagree might in principle be arguing out > >of prejudice. That is the mentality of the conspiracy theorist. > > This is true for me as well, though knowing that humans as a species > seem to > enjoy practicing prejudice came forewarn someone that tests of any kind > and > the evaluations of those tests are also subject to prejudices, > narrowness of > concept, etc. ::shrug:: Can we as a species evaluate non-human > intelligence > not based on environmental manipulation (e.g. tool making)? For me, > this > wanders very close to my perpetual question as to whether I can conceive > of > a truly non-human language-concept.
This is related to why I scrapped my then chief coniverse in, IIRC, 1997, and started the one in which most of my conlangs are spoken in. The old one contained several intelligent extraterrestrial species, and I eventually came to feel that they failed to live up to my modest demand for plausibility in two ways: 1) the existence of several alien civilzations at roughly the same technological level as we but none significantly more advanced must be essentially nil, and 2) no matter how alien I tried to make the extraterrestrials, they still seemed way to human. Should we one day meet 'intelligent' extraterrestrials, we might very well be able to discuss maths and astronomy with them, but I'd be quite pessimistic about the possibilities for meaningfully discussing things involving emotions and Weltanschauung. Dolphins may be a better bet, since they are not too alien - their brains, as far as known, work much like ours - but I still expect their minds to be quite different from ours, perhaps to the point of making communication deeper than "the fish is over there" pointless. I've never tried to make any of my conlangs 'truly non-human', not even Yargish, which is supposedly spoken by non-humans, because I do not believe I could possibly succeed. Anything I create will be either a human language, or not a language at all. Andreas