Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Trigger language question concerning the use of "to be"

From:Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Monday, May 9, 2005, 17:42
This seems to have generated quite a few replies, but as far as I can see
most are concerned with different meanings of "to be" in English (which it
certainly has).

On Sunday, May 8, 2005, at 09:57 , Alex J. Man wrote:

> Okay, I've been developing a language that uses a trigger system and > have decided that there will be no "to be."
In the proper sense of the word, triggering is commonplace in many (most?) languages, for example the pronoun "I" triggers the form "am" (and not "is" or "are") in English. But I assume from the subject line - and indeed you make this clear later in your mail - you are referring to the type of construction found in Tagalog and related languages. One point I think worth mentioning is that the 'trigger' analysis is not the only way of analyzing this construction nor, I understand, the one actually favored by Tagalog linguists themselves. In my recent mail on the "Tagalog discussion" thread I refer to the analysis of Paz Naylor - and this approach is by no means just hers. This has no reference to triggers or triggering.
> State verbs, > particularly, replace its role. Eg, He is good would be translated as > He goods.
Cf. Paz Naylor's example: Maganda ang babae STATIVE-beauty NOM woman In her analysis, Tagalog is reckoned not to have syntactic verbs, but quasi-verb nouns. 'maganda' is, in this analysis, a noun denoting the stative concept of being beautiful. To quote her: "Schachter and Otanes (1972), Naylor (1980), Ferrell and Stanley (1980) and others have pointed out that Tagalog and/or Philippine-type sentence structure is like an equation, it is thus _bipartite_ and one nucleus constituent _equates_ with the other and the two are joined by parataxis." Elsewhere in her paper she refers to the two parts as the Comment and Topic; 'ang' is the topic marker which she refers to as 'nom' (i.e. the nominative marker).
> However, I have come across the problem when addressing > infinitives. How, exactly, would a sentence such as "To defend is to > attack" for example be handled in this case? Both words are > infinitives, leaving no place for a verb to exist.
Yes, but what the problem, unless of course you also have the same problem with "The woman is a teacher." Both 'woman' and 'teacher' are nouns. Similarly an infinitive or gerund is a verbal _noun_, cf. Latin: defendere est oppugnare. As Paz Naylor and others do not regard Tagalog as having syntactic verbs, "leaving no place for a verb to exist" is not a problem :) Titser ang babae teacher NOM woman = The woman is a teacher has exactly the same form as: Maganda ang babae = The woman is beautiful and: Umalis ang babae = The woman left. leave.AF.COMP NOM. woman [AF = actor focus; COMP = completive]
> Is there a > grammatical way around this problem?
Same as for "The teacher is a woman". [snip]
> To be safe, I'll provide a little background information on Valruzi. > Valruzi utilizes a trigger system, like tagalog, in which nouns are > marked as either trigger, oblique, genitive, agentive, or patientive. > the case or role of the trigger, or focus, is marked on the verb.
Yep - this is a common way of explaining the Tagalog structure - but it ain't the only one (and calling the noun that triggers the form the 'focus' causes confusions as some - e.g. Paz Naylor - called it the 'topic' and the others call it the 'subject'; it is not the meaning of 'focus' when generally used linguistics). But it is not the only way of explaining it.
> This eliminates the need for active/passive or > transitive/intransitive.
Yep - it does - but it creates other needs :)
> The language also has eliminated to > verb, "to have" in a sense - translating sentences such as "I have a > car" as "My cars exists" (dubbed existence sentences).
Yes, there is natlang precedence for that.
> Gerunds and participles are also utilized extensively.
Well, as On Sunday, May 8, 2005, at 11:09 , Roger Mills wrote: [sni]
> I think you answer your own question later on: "Gerunds and > participles are also utilized extensively." So use the gerund form, or > some other nominal derivative, like "defense".
If you have gerunds, then use them in exactly the same way as you would in a sentence such as "The teacher is a woman" - I assume the latter does have a Valruzi equivalent. The woman (is) a teacher Defending (is) attacking Or, possibly, as Roger suggested: Defense (is) attack.
> In addition there are > three aspects that CAN be infixed: inchoative (entering a state), > inceptive (beginning an activity), or cessative (stopping). Three > tenses: present, future, and past are used. whew, sorry if that's a > bit lengthy, but this is my first post and I decided to play it safe > and give some background info on the subject.
Sounds interesting - I hope the above is not too confusing and does help :) Ray =============================================== http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown ray.brown@freeuk.com =============================================== Anything is possible in the fabulous Celtic twilight, which is not so much a twilight of the gods as of the reason." [JRRT, "English and Welsh" ]

Reply

Chris Bates <chris.maths_student@...>